by N. Karl Haden, Ph.D.
As I said in Part I, justice is a complex concept. Even the application of justice to the workplace is difficult to circumscribe, because the concept is so broad. From one perspective, laws define justice. During the industrial revolution, labor unions emerged to define justice by protecting the rights of workers. Institutions and companies develop policies and procedures to define what justice means in their organizations. In these examples, justice is generally described as fairness. Below are four basic ways of thinking about justice as fairness, whether in organizations or governments:
- Procedural justice is about the fairness and openness of processes by which decisions are made.
- Distributive justice addresses fairness in the allocation of resources and goods.
- Interactional justice is about the fairness of interpersonal treatment by those in power and colleagues.
- Retributive justice concerns the response to a wrong act—for example, punishment in retribution for doing something considered wrong.
While we cannot here define all the ways that the leader ensures fairness, below is a basic checklist, in no order, for leaders to consider:
- Are employees paid fairly for the work that they do in comparison to others with similar responsibilities and in relation to organizational resources?
- Do employees understand organizational policies, procedures, and measures that affect their successful job performance? Do they understand the consequences of not performing to established standards? (Understanding is more than just being told.)
- Are employees invited to engage in meaningful conversations with leadership?
- Are the necessary resources—human, financial, and other—provided for the employee to achieve the outcomes expected of him or her?
- Does the organization discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age, disability, or genetic information?
- Do employees have a means of addressing conflicts or disagreements with organizational leadership and with colleagues?
- Can employees advance to greater levels of responsibility and contribution based on performance? If not, can the employee leave the organization for new opportunities without repercussions?
Use this checklist to consider and to assess fairness in your company or institution. If there are problems ensuring fairness, what specifically can you do to address them?
Justice as fairness is a minimum standard. While leaders sometimes claim to be “more than fair,” anything less than fair is unjust. I would like to go beyond the minimum and look at justice in the way that I defined it in Part II, in the context of transformational leadership. This type of justice is more proactive than fairness. The leader’s motive becomes a primary consideration, because he or she is genuinely motivated by a concern for others, even while clearly focusing on the organization’s mission and goals.
A principle taught at the Disney Institute is that the extent to which the leader genuinely cares for his or her employees is the same extent to which they will care for clients, students, customers, and one another. Based on his research, Stanford University business professor Jeffery Pfeffer found that work environments impact employees’ health, medical costs, and even life span. He argues that, “The greatest leaders are the ones who run places that care for their employees … and those who run organizations whose mission and purpose entails caring for people’s health and well-being.” Pfeffer then gives examples—people like James Goodnight, co-founder and CEO of software company SAS Institute, a company with a designated Chief Health Officer, and Amir Dan Rubin, CEO of Stanford Healthcare, who led in the adoption of the mission, “healing humanity through science and compassion, one person at a time.” I wrote in Part II, “If we believe that humans have a right to achieve their potential, then justice supports that an environment and culture that support human achievement are due. Concerned for others, the virtuous leader will create an environment and culture in which followers can thrive.”
I would like to propose a second checklist. Like the first, it is incomplete, but the focus of this list goes beyond fairness to thriving, to justice as transformative leadership:
- Do employees receive training and development to help them improve job performance, work competencies, and themselves?
- Do the leaders of the organization inspire through a compelling vision and mission? Is the organization purpose driven, and do employees buy in to the purpose?
- Are the values of the organization clear? Does leadership model those values?
- Are employees encouraged to take vacations and time away from work to reflect and recharge? Away means without being tethered by technology.
- Does the organization have a wellness program?
- Within appropriate limits, are employees encouraged to try new ideas and, when not successful, learn from failures?
- Is there a reward system that goes beyond monetary compensation (e.g., recognition, time off, and other nonmonetary rewards)?
- Are employees encouraged to contribute to causes outside of the organization through volunteer activities and other involvement—on the organization’s time?
- Does the organization promote mentoring of less-experienced employees by more-experienced, successful employees?
One of the aims of these three blog posts on justice is to give the reader deeper insight into a complex idea, the “outward-looking virtue.” But, as with the other virtues, the aim is not knowledge but practice. To that end, I hope the reader finds the checklists worthy of consideration, exploration, discussion, and, where needed, action.
Jones, Bruce. Great leaders show genuine care for their teams. Harvard Business Review, February 28, 2017, https://hbr.org/sponsored/2017/02/great-leaders-show-genuine-care-for-their-teams.
Lynch, Shana. Why your workplace might be killing you. Insights by Stanford Business, February 23, 2015, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/why-your-workplace-might-be-killing-you.
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. Who are the world’s best leaders? Fortune, May 26, 2015, http://fortune.com/2015/03/26/best-leaders-employee-well-being/.
by Rob Jenkins
Years ago, when I was a basketball coach at a small college, I would talk with other coaches about our version of the classic Machiavellian dilemma: Was it better, we wondered, for our players to like or respect us? I generally came down on the side of respect.
After I left coaching to become an academic administrator, I faced the same question in leading and supervising faculty members. At first I thought that maybe it was better to be liked by your colleagues than respected, but I soon figured out that the correct answer was "neither."
The most important thing, by far, was for faculty members to trust me. Everything else was secondary.
It’s difficult to earn people’s trust — and it most definitely must be earned. I’ve known new leaders who came in the door admonishing dubious and sometimes jaded professors, "You’ve just got to trust me." But why should we? First let’s see what you do, and then we’ll decide if you’re worthy of our trust.
As a leader, you can do two things to win over the people you lead: (1) Be trustworthy yourself; and (2) exhibit trust in others. I’ll tackle the second installment of this two-part series. For now, here are some ways leaders can establish a reputation for trustworthiness.
Tell the truth. And tell it in every situation, insofar as you are able. It sounds so simple, yet telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth can be anything but.
Even leaders who are normally honest are constantly tempted to hedge a bit or color the truth, often because they don’t want to look bad in front of colleagues. So they use traffic as an excuse for why they’re late to a meeting, when the truth is they lost track of time. Or they say they never received an email that they actually just neglected to read. Small lies, yes, but they chip away at your character and good name.
One way to avoid such lies is to get to the meeting on time and read all those emails. Knowing that the alternative requires admitting culpability can be a powerful motivator. But when you do screw up — as we all do — people are more likely to trust you if you admit it. (Of course, that admission won’t help you build trust if the mistake has become a habit.)
Another reason we sometimes lie, as leaders, is that we don’t want people to dislike us or be angry at us. So we fudge a little, or sugarcoat the truth, in an attempt to make a less than ideal situation seem rosier than it is. That strategy nearly always backfires, for once people do learn the truth — and they will — they’re bound to be even angrier, knowing you kept it from them. What’s more, you’ve weakened their trust in your leadership.
But notice the qualifier: You must tell the truth "insofar as you are able." Sometimes, as a leader, you simply don’t know the truth. In that case, you’ve got to acknowledge as much, even if you fear it will make you seem weak. That’s better than pretending you know something you don’t — which, again, is bound to backfire. And at other times, you have been entrusted with information that is not yours to disclose. Being truthful in those moments means stating that you’re not at liberty to talk about a particular topic. Which brings me to my next point.
Keep confidences. One of the best ways to earn people’s trust is to make it clear that their private information is safe with you. As a manager, you have access to a great deal of data about people — addresses, phone numbers, salaries. Much of the information may be available on the internet, but that does not give you license to broadcast it. Nobody trusts a blabbermouth.
People in your unit will occasionally come to you privately, seeking your advice or perhaps just an ear. Sometimes they might want to gossip about or criticize colleagues — and you should shut that down quickly. Most of the time, however, they just want to talk about themselves: their hopes, fears, and anxieties, or whatever they happen to be going through at that moment.
Most of the time you can, and should, keep their disclosures to yourself. If a co-worker confides that she’s fighting breast cancer, you definitely keep that secret. At some point, you may advise her to let her friends and colleagues know what’s going on, but that information is not yours to divulge.
Some confidences, though, you cannot keep. If a faculty member lets slip that he’s been having an affair with a student — well, no, you can’t keep that "just between us." Obviously, for the good of the student, the department, and the institution, you have to report it. Being trustworthy, in that case, means that people know you can be trusted to do the right thing.
Follow through. The older I get, the more I’m convinced that one of the rarest things in the world is for people to actually do what they say they’re going to do — when they say they’re going to do it.
In academia we’re so used to people making promises that go unfulfilled — overselling and underdelivering — that we’ve become jaded. When we hear the new dean/provost/president/CEO talk about making some much-needed change, we tend to roll our eyes and think, "Yeah, I’ll believe it when I see it."
If you want people to trust you, be as good as your word. Don’t make promises that you know you might not be able to keep. When you tell people you’re going to do something, do it. And when you simply can’t, then explain why you’re not going to be able to keep that promise, and apologize. If you consistently keep your word, and explain when you can’t, faculty members will come to respect you and, more important, trust you.
Have people’s backs. This is the most important point: If you want to earn and keep people’s trust, the best thing you can do is consistently be on their side.
My observation — as someone who’s been in professional life for 32 years — is that we seem to have bred a generation of leaders who care only about themselves, who will throw anyone under the bus without a second thought if they believe it will advance their own careers. That certainly does not apply to all leaders, but the number of people like that whom I’ve encountered is enough to alarm me — and motivate me to write posts like this.
For people to trust you, they must have absolute confidence that you will have their backs in virtually every situation, whether they are under attack from students, parents, colleagues, other administrators, or outside entities.
I could add, "as long as they deserve it." On occasion, one of your people will genuinely be in the wrong, and your responsibility as a leader will be either to take appropriate action or to allow them to suffer the natural consequences of their behavior. Nevertheless, your default position must be to defend them— to take their side unless you have sufficient evidence that you’re mistaken.
If you follow consistently these four pieces of advice — tell the truth, keep confidences, follow through, and defend people — you will have taken significant steps to earn their trust. However, there is one more thing you need to do in order to seal the deal: Trust them as well. I’ll talk about that in Part II.